# About — My Peptide Solution

> Why My Peptide Solution exists, how it reads and cites the peptide research literature, and what an independent research digest will never do.

Why My Peptide Solution exists, how it reads the literature, and what it will never do.

## Why this site exists

My Peptide Solution started from a simple frustration: searches for BPC-157, CJC-1295, MOTS-c, PT-141, and tirzepatide return an overwhelming mix of vendor marketing, forum anecdote, and outdated blog copy, with almost no honest accounting of how mature the actual science is for each compound. This site organizes five of the most-searched research peptides around the problem each one is supposed to solve — tissue repair, growth-hormone axis, metabolic regulation, sexual desire, weight management — and states the plain truth about what has been studied, in whom, and how far that evidence actually reaches. No two of these five compounds are at the same stage of evidence. That distinction is stated explicitly on every page, not buried in a footnote.

## How we read the evidence

Every claim about mechanism, trial results, or effect size on this site traces to a specific cited source, listed in full on the [references page](/references). Three tiers of evidence are handled differently: peer-reviewed human trial data (the strongest tier, and the only tier that supports any claim about what a compound does in people), animal and cell-culture data (useful for mechanism, not proof of human effect), and community-reported anecdote (labeled explicitly as anecdotal wherever it appears, never presented as clinical evidence). Where a compound's human evidence is thin — as it is for BPC-157, CJC-1295, and MOTS-c — that limitation is stated plainly rather than left for mechanistic plausibility to paper over.

## What this site will never do

This site does not sell peptides, does not link to vendors, and does not recommend a dose for any compound, in any context, for any person. Describing a dose used in a cited clinical trial is not the same as recommending one, and that line is kept firm throughout. Brand names of competing approved drugs are not used. This site does not give medical advice, and nothing here should be read as a substitute for a conversation with a licensed clinician who knows an individual's actual health history. If a page on this site ever reads like it is nudging toward a purchase or a specific action, that is a failure of editorial standard, not the intent of it.

## Editorial standards

Every factual claim on this site is checked against its cited source before publication, and every citation is verifiable — a PubMed listing, a DOI, or a regulatory document — on the [references page](/references). Community-reported effects are labeled anecdotal wherever they appear and are never used to support a claim about what a compound clinically does. This is a literature digest, written and maintained independently, with no product to sell.

---

My Peptide Solution states plainly what the published research does and doesn't support — it is not a clinic, not a supplier, and not a substitute for a licensed clinician's judgment.